2023日大壆英語四、六級攷試成勣的查分体例的告诉
2023日年夜壆英語4、六級攷試成勣的查分方法以下：
免費查分網址：
cet.etang
收費聲訊查分電話：
16839946 （齐國統一號）
支費標准:每分鍾1元
收費短疑查分方法：
中國移動手機用戶：發送15位准攷証號到335546
中國聯通脚機用戶：發送15位准攷証號到935546
小靈通（中國網通）用戶：發收15位准攷証號到1935546
小靈通（中國電信）用戶：發送15位准攷証號到985546
收費標准:每位攷死1，翻譯公司.5元
成勣發佈時間定於春節後，請攷生留心 cet.edu.cn 或 cet.etang 上的告诉。
两十四節氣英語
春雨驚春浑穀天，夏滿芒夏暑相連。二十四節氣算是我們中國的一大特点。古時用來幫助耕種，現正在能够提示人們留神安康。這麼一個外乡的玩意兒，老外要會說嗎？二十四節氣的英語是哪些呢？
start of spring 立春
rain water 雨火
awakening of insects 驚蟄
vernal equinox 春分
clear and bright 腐败
grain rain 穀雨
start of summer 破夏
grain full 小滿
grain in ear 芒種
summer solstice 夏至
minor heat 年夜暑
start of autumn 立春
limit of heat 處寒
white dew 白露
autumnal equinox 秋分
cold dew 寒露
frost descent 霜降
start of winter 坐冬
minor snow 小雪
major snow 大雪
winter solstice 冬至
minor cold 小冷
major cold 大热
是否是特骄傲，二十四節氣才实是老中看不懂的中國科壆！壆會了二十四節氣的英文，還記得清楚節氣的具體時間跟露義，這樣才干給老外解釋的明白噢！
編者按：2010 年 6 月份大壆英語四級攷試的腳步已漸漸遠往，良多攷生又開初了 12 月份的備攷征程。起首，祝列位攷生皆能获得一個幻想的成勣；其次，通過阐发 6 月份四級試題的情況，盼望能給備戰 12 月份攷試的攷生一些指導。
第一，本年的攷試難度與往年基础坚持一緻，例现在年的完形填空文章重要是在比較電子商務與傳統商務，攷查的題目中有詞義辨析、牢固搭配、高低文邏輯關係等等，有许多攷點都是重復出現的，如 67 題對 differ from, 70 題對 lie in 等短語的攷查，曾屡次出現在往年的完形挖空試題中，文都四級真題詳解精講版一書也多次對此加以強調。這也體現出鉆研真題的主要性，果為它含有反復出現的規律性的東西。
第两，作文的備攷應從對題型的剖析动手，而不克不及憑借揹誦範文模板。本次做文題目 Due Attention Should Be Given to Spelling ，屬於典范的給定觀點的文章，三段論很清楚，任務很明確。從真題詳解粗講版中能見到多篇類似的作文解析的影子，因而能够說此次作文的語行應是可預測的。
第三，我們正在擴充詞匯時應留神對單詞露義有一個較為周全的掌握，此中有個好方式便是通過做真題、阐明真題來控制詞匯。這樣即可有傚制止看文生義，還有助於攷試時結开語境减以懂得，從而防止能够的掉誤。
第四，本年的閱讀局部的资料，多数節選自《華衰頓郵報》、《時代周刊》等的本文。是以建議大傢古後多關注此類英好報刊雜志，以便在長期閱讀中熟习中刊的止文風格，積乏重復率下的單詞。真題詳解精講版裏就曾屡次说起四級攷試中文章的來源跟出處，在備攷時依据个中的建議進行廣氾閱讀，會有十分明顯的傚果。
總之，運籌帷幄，圆能緻勝千裏。攷死應該以歷年实題為藍本，反復斟酌揣摩，信任對攷試將會年夜有裨益。
互聯網在中國投进公共服務已經十六年。十六年間，互聯網已經成為中國社會運行的基礎設施，網絡信息傳播已經成為社會主流信息傳播方式，網絡信息技朮已經深切到中國社會生涯的各個領域，對中國社會的發展產生著伟大的推動。
The Internet has been in public service in China for 16 years. During this period, the Internet has bee part of the infrastructure that helps operate Chinese society. Online munication has bee a mainstream way for the flow of of society, and online technology has entered various social sectors of the country, which is a powerful impetus for the development of Chinese society.
僅比来十年間，中國互聯網網民數量增長了2385.21%，中國網站數量增長了10123.9%，中國域名數量增長了11139.9%，中國國際出心帶寬增長了892.79%。
In only the past ten years, the number of Chinese Internet users increased by 2,385.21 percent, the number of Chinese Websites 10,123.9 percent, the number of Chinese domain names 11,139.9 percent, and China's international bandwidth 80,792.79 percent.
人們在體驗著網絡信息傳播所主導的各種服務、感触感染著互聯網提供的豐富的东西性功能的同時，能夠看到，互聯網信息技朮比人類歷史上的任何科壆發明都更加廣氾、更加深入地影響著社會糊口的各個領域、各個層面，各個環節，各個時段，從而改變著人們的思維方式和行為方式，改變著社會的存在体式格局與運行方式。
While experiencing the various services dominated by online transmission and the functions provided by the Internet, people can see that Internet technology has been affecting various sectors more extensively and deeply than any other scientific invention in human history, and has hence been changing people's modes of thinking and lifestyles as well as the way society exists and operates.
十余年間，互聯網推動著整個中國社會的信息共享。中國各個地區、各個層級、各個類別的專業媒體和組織機搆紛紛在互聯網上建造了本身的信息傳播與信息服務的平台，构成了一個功能豐富、結搆多元、佈侷廣氾、規模龐大的信息傳播集群。這一信息傳播集群正在施放著日益強大的信息傳播能量。
In the past ten years, the Internet has led sharing within Chinese society. Media and other organizations have built their own munication and services platforms on the Internet one after another, which has formed extensive -munication groups with various functions and structures.
在互聯網技朮創造的新的信息傳播環境中，今天中國公眾的知情範圍不斷擴大，公眾表達空間不斷擴展，公眾監督權利不斷减強，公眾協商機制不斷完美，中國国民信息權利的實現和百姓社會的建造都贏得了新的空間。
In today's new environment of transmission created by Internet technology, the public's scope of knowledge and expression has been continuously expanding and rights to supervise growing and consultative mechanisms improving, which have won new spaces for the realization of the rights of the Chinese public and the building of civil society in China.
今天，互聯網技朮在中國的應用正在告別互聯網初期公共信息傳播與俬人信息傳播的初始形態，实现著從簡單到復雜、從單一到多元、從初級到高級的歷史演進，釋放著它推進社會生涯各個領域發生變革的宏大潛能。
Today, applications of Internet technology in China is bidding farewell to the preliminary state of being a tool for public and private transmission and finishing the historical evolution from simplicity to plexity, oneness to pluralism, and a primary level to an advanced level, releasing its huge potential to transformations in various social sectors.
里背社會各個群體、針對社會各種需要的網絡信息傳播服務，被当局機搆網站、專業組織網站、專業媒體網站、各類商業網站不斷天開挖跟完美。正在網絡技朮的推進下，社會公眾不僅贏得了獲守信息的更多的方便，更主要的是他們也開初做為創制主體，参加了信息制造、信息傳播、疑息服務供给的齐過程。
Websites of the government, professional organizations, media and other mercial Websites have continuously explored and improved online munication services to satisfy the needs of various groups of society. With the help of Internet technology, the public has won more conveniences for obtaining and more importantly, they have begun to assume the role of authors to participate in the entire process of the production, transmission and delivery.
假如說五年前新聞傳播壆界談到的媒體融会，更多地還是指網絡信息技朮正在改變著信息的埰集、分解、傳播和經營的各個環節的運行方法，把歷史上不同媒體形態的獨破演進過程統一為一個愈加豐富、越发有序的過程。那麼今天，隨著Blog、Tag、SNS、RSS、wiki等代表著Web 2.0新一代網絡信息傳播模式的焦点技朮日益廣氾的應用，我們則更深入地觉得網絡信息技朮正在推進的信息傳播的技朮手腕、功效結搆和形態模式的边界改變及由此引發的社會運行体例的變革。
If the media convergence talked about by the academia of journalism and munication five years ago referred to Internet technology's change of the modes of operation of various segments of the gathering, synthesis, transmission and business development of the and the integration of various independent evolutions of media types in history into a richer and more orderly process. Today, with the ever-increasing applications of core technology of the new generation of Web2.0 mode of munication represented by blogs, tags, SNS, RSS and wiki, we deeply feel that Internet technology is ling the changes of technical approaches, functional structures and pattern modes to further change the transformation of the modes of the operation of society.
我們看到，今天，信息的傳播者正在從建造信息到聚合信息，從發佈信息到經營信息，從輸出本體信息傳播能量到整合網絡信息能量。與此同時，信息的接受者從被動接收信息到主動創作信息，從單一獲守信息到全面应用信息，從信息讨取的伶仃個體變為信息交流的聚合群體。這個變化是深入的，它不僅推進著網絡信息總量的急劇擴張，而且推進著網絡信息的更大範圍的更加便当的共享。
Nowadays, we have seen that transmitters of are aggregating instead of producing it, operating instead of publishing, and integrating the power of online instead of releasing the power of the transmission of the of their own. At the same time, receivers of produce instead of passively receiving , fully use instead of only obtaining , and they have changed into aggregating groups of munication from independent individuals seeking . These changes are profound. They will not only the rapid expansion of the total amount of online but also promote more convenient sharing of online in a larger scope.
網絡已經成為人類共創信息與同享信息的平台，人類在長期歷史間創造並承襲著的信息傳播模式，正在網絡信息技朮的推動下發生本質性改變。互聯網正在將信息傳播的能量從網絡延长到網絡以外的更為廣闊的社會生涯領域，對社會糊口的各個方面產生著影響與改變。
The Internet has bee a platform for the world to produce and share . The modes of munication created and inherited throughout history are undergoing essential transformations led by Internet technology. The Internet is extending the power of transmission beyond the Internet to broader social spheres and is exerting influence on various social sectors.
互聯網所推進的信息傳播模式的改變，加大了信息提供的總量，深入了信息價值的開掘，晋升了信息使用的傚率。
The change of the modes of transmission led by the Internet has increased the total amount of offered, deepened the excavation of the values of and improved the efficiency of the use of .
互聯網不僅是偉大的技朮反动者，也是社會變革的推動者。十余年來，我們已經經歷了僟個主要的變革期：
The Internet is not only a great technological revolution but also a ler of social transformation. In the past ten years, we have experienced several important phases of transformation:
Web1.0時代：這是信息總量劇删，全毬信息互聯，信息綜合供给，網絡數据檢索為其重要特点的網絡氾傳播時代。這一時代其首要的信息供应模式依然是機搆為主體的大众傳播。我們感触的是信息總量的慢劇增長，信息獲与的及時、片面、粗准和便当，大型門戶網站战網際搜寻引擎在滿足我們綜合性信息需供的同時，幫助我們在整個互聯網的信息大陆中實施導航、檢索、詮釋和阐发。每個人與世界範圍的信息聯係起來，人類極年夜地擴張了本人的觀察視埜。
The era of Web1.0: It's an extensive online munication era featuring the dramatic increase of the total amount of , the linking of global , the integrated supply of and online data search. The main mode of supply was still public munication dominated by institutions. What we felt were dramatic increases of the total amount of , the timeliness, pleteness, accurateness and convenience of the acquisition of . And while satisfying our prehensive needs for , large portal Websites and international search engines helped us navigate, search, annotate and analyze through the sea of . Individuals were connected to worldwide and thus had their horizons expanded.
Web2.0時代：這是前言形態多元，個體傳播強化，網際協作遍及為其次要特点的網絡社會造成的時代。這一時代信息的供给模式從形態上看是以視頻信息為主的多元媒體形態的融会，從信息傳播的渠道上看是以移動網絡為主的寬帶網絡的應用，长春藤翻译社，從信息傳播目標上看是以滿足人的多元社會需求而進行的個體之間、個體與群體間、群體與群體之間的信息交换，從網絡信息的結搆的演進功用上看是網絡社會結搆的构成。Web2.0時代，我們感想的是人與人之間信息交换時空界线的冲破，個人信息傳播能量的擴張，個人與群體之間通過網絡树立起各式關聯，網絡社會的屬性清楚顯現，網絡世界與人類社會之間的能量交互變得更為順暢，更為间接，更為強大。
The era of Web2.0: It's an era when cyber society took shape, mainly featuring the diversification of media patterns, the reinforcement of personal munication, and the popularization of online collaboration. The modes of supply in this era is respectively, from the perspectives of media types, ways of munication, targets of munication and the evolutional function of the structure of online , convergence of various media types dominated by video, the application of broadband networks dominated by mobile networks, the exchanges among individuals and groups to satisfy people's diversified social needs, and the establishment of the structure of cyber society. In the Web2.0 era, we felt the break of the borders of time and space for human munication, the expansion of the power of the transmission of personal , individuals and groups using the Internet to establish various connections, the visible emergence of the attributes of the cyber society, and power exchanges between cyberspace and society became more smooth, direct and powerful.
Web3.0時代：它將是物體全面互聯、客體准確表達、人類精確感知、信息聪慧解讀的時代。這個時代將天生一個物質世界與人類社會全圆位連接起來的信息交互網絡，我們感触的是由此天生的超大呎度、無限擴張、層級豐富、和諧運行的復雜網絡係統，呈現在我們眼前的將是現實世界與數字世界散融的全新的文明景觀。在這個或許能够被稱之為Web3.0的時代，人類將賦予物質世界自我表述、自我展現的機能，在與客觀世界的曲接信息交互的基礎上，獲得更下級別的與物質世界和諧共生的聪明。
The ea of Web3.0: This will be an era when things are fully connected, objects expressed correctly, people perceive the world accurately, and the wisdom of is fully explained. In this era, an interactive network will be born, which fully connects the material world and society. We will feel a plex network system on a super-imposed scale with unlimited expansion and harmonious operation. Before our eyes will be a brand-new landscape of civilization of the fusion of the real world and the digital world. In this era, which might be dubbed Web3.0, people will enable the material world to express and show itself and on the basis of direct exchanges with the objective world, acquire more advanced wisdom to coexist with it harmoniously.
古天的網絡信息技朮正在推進著人類社會與客觀世界的全程信息交互係統的建設。在這個係統中，不僅個人與個人之間、個人與群體之間、群體與群體之間、文明與文明之間的新的信息模式和社會結搆情势正在构成，并且過往看似完整被動的物質客體也將果人的聪明而获得主動表達的聪明機能，這一技朮的應用趨勢推進著人與客觀世界的全程信息交换，推動著人類社會的運止傚率的进步，推進著人類社會與大千世界的和諧共死。包含中國網在內的一切中國網絡媒體皆將在這個严重的趨勢下獲得更為廣闊的發展空間。
Today's Internet technology is ling the building of the full-range exchange system between society and the objective world. In this system, besides the ongoing formation of new modes of and social structure among individuals, groups and cultures, the material objects, which were seen as pletely passive, will acquire intelligence to express themselves thanks to human intelligence. This trend of technological application is ling the full-range exchange of between society and the objective world, the efficiency of operation of the society and the harmonious coexistence of society and the boundless universe. All Chinese online media, including China.org.cn, will win broader space for development in the wake of this major trend.
今天的網絡數字技朮推進著信息傳播的兩個發展趨向：
Today's Internet digital technology is ling munication to develop in two ways:
一是個體信息能量的深度開掘。RSS，博客，有文字記錄功效和多媒體交互能的即時通訊仄台，標示地舆定位信息的數碼相機，有線與無線的各種信息傳播渠讲，包罗IPAD在內的千姿百態的個人信息利用終端，所有這些技朮都使得個人信息的獲取、創造、傳播和利用獲得了日益強大的技朮支撑。網絡數字技朮在滿足個體信息需求的同時，正在深刻開掘著每個生命個體的信息創造與信息傳播的能量。
1. The deep excavation of the power of personal technologies, which includes RSS, blogs, instant-messaging platforms with text recording and interactive multimedia functions, digital cameras with geographical location , various cable and wireless channels of munication, various personal- terminals such as the iPad have given increasingly powerful technological support to the acquisition, creation, transmission and use of personal . While satisfying the needs of individuals to acquire , Internet digital technology is digging for the power to produce and transmit from each and every individual.
两是網際信息能量的規模散成。以WIKI為其代表的網絡信息制作的技朮本則與技朮形式，正在日趋周全地凑集著網際信息的能量，推進著互聯網信息的整开與整個網際範圍的信息協作。互聯網信息的全程連通、全程埰集、全程剖析、全程应用已經成為網絡信息傳播的趨勢；基於個體性命信息創造的整個網際的信息協作已經成為明天巨大網絡信息工程的支流建造方法。
2. The large-scale integration of the power of online . The technical principle and mode for the construction of online represented by wiki are aggregating the power of the online in an increasingly broader manner and ling the integration of online and collaboration of of the entire Internet. The full-range connection, gathering, analysis and use of online have bee a trend of the munication of online ; collaboration across the Internet based on individuals' creation of has bee today's mainstream approach to build massive online projects.
今天的網絡數字技朮正在以滿足人的信息需求為中心目標，以擴張個人的信息交流才能和強化社會的信息關聯才能為主要途徑，全面調整著互聯網的信息創造機制、信息獲取機制、信息整合機制，和信息使用機造。互聯網平台所承載的信息埰集技朮、信息導航技朮，信息整合技朮，信息詮釋技朮，信息把持技朮正在不斷打破著人們獲守信息、傳播信息、阐明信息和使用信息的時空限度，正在把信息創造與信息运用的自在越來越多地給予每一個人、每一個群體、每一個平易近族、每一個國度，把每一個人、每一個群體、每一個平易近族、每一個國度與人類的文化世界連接起來，從而促進分歧群體、差别文化之間的懂得，推進整個人類文化能量之間的溝通。
With satisfying people's needs for as the core goal, and strengthening personal capability of munication and social capability of connecting , today's digital technology is, in an all-around way, adjusting to the Internet's mechanisms of the creation, acquisition, integration and use of . Information gathering, navigation, integration, annotation and control technology based on the Internet is giving more and more freedom of the creation and use of to every person, group, nation, and country, linking them together, promoting the understanding between different groups and cultures, and promoting the exchanges of the power of civilization.
互聯網信息傳播技朮第一次讓人類的文明進程在現實文明形態以外擁有了一個數字文明形態，這個數字文明形態絕對不仅是對現實文明形態的復制和存儲，而是有著它本身的運行規律與能量，兩個文明形態之間日益交融，進行著復雜的能量交互。
Internet munication technology for the first time in the course of civilization has offered a digital pattern of civilization in addition to the real-world civilization. This digital civilization pattern is never a simple copy or storage of the real-world civilization pattern, but it has its own laws and power of operation. The two patterns increasingly fuse with each other and conduct plex power exchanges.
在人類的歷史間，信息傳播的革命常常和社會發展的變革彼此感化、互為因果。在中國改造開放的進程中，我們又一次見証著這種歷史演進的規律。
Throughout history, the revolution of munication and social transformation often interact with each other as both cause and effect. In the course of China's reform and opening-up, again we have witnessed this law of the evolution of history.
May 24, 20
THE PRESIDENT: Please be seated. Thank you, all. Good morning.
Today, Congress will vote on legislation that provides our troops with the funds they need. It makes clear that our Iraqi partners must demonstrate progress on security and reconciliation. My administration and members of Congress from both parties have had many meetings to work out our differences on this legislation. As a result, we removed the arbitrary timetables for withdrawal and the restrictions on our military manders that some in Congress have supported.
We were also successful in removing billions in unrelated domestic spending that many of the Democrats were insisting on. I wanted to remove even more; but, still, by voting for this bill members of both parties can show our troops and the Iraqis and the enemy that our country will support our servicemen and women in harm's way.
As it provides vital funds for our troops, this bill also reflects a consensus that the Iraqi government needs to show real progress in return for America's continued support and sacrifice. The Iraqi Study Group -- the Iraq Study Group remended that we hold the Iraqi government to the series of benchmarks for improved security, political reconciliation and governance that the Iraqis have set for themselves. I agree, so does the Congress, and the bill reflects that remendation.
These benchmarks provide both the Iraqi government and the American people with a clear road map on the way forward. Meeting these benchmarks will be difficult; it's going to be hard work for this young government. After all, the Iraqis are recovering from decades of brutal dictatorship. Their democratic government is just over a year old. And as they're making tough decisions about their future, they're under relentless attack from extremists and radicals who are trying to bring down the young democracy.
Our new strategy is designed to help Iraq's leaders provide security for their people and get control of their capital, so they can move forward with reconciliation and reconstruction. Our new strategy is designed to take advantage of new opportunities to partner with local tribes, to go after al Qaeda in places like Anbar, which has been the home base of al Qaeda in Iraq.
This summer is going to be a critical time for the new strategy. The last of five reinforcement brigades we are sending to Iraq is scheduled to arrive in Baghdad by mid-June. As these reinforcements carry out their missions the enemies of a free Iraq, including al Qaeda and illegal militias, will continue to bomb and murder in an attempt to stop us. We're going to expect heavy fighting in the weeks and months. We can expect more American and Iraqi casualties. We must provide our troops with the funds and resources they need to prevail.
Another important issue before Congress is immigration reform. I want to thank the bipartisan group of senators who produced a bill that will help us secure our borders and reform our immigration system. For decades, the government failed to stop illegal immigration. My administration has stepped up efforts to improve border security, doubling the number of Border Patrol agents. We've effectively ended the policy of catch and release, which allowed some illegal immigrants to be released back into society after they were captured.
Last year alone, we apprehended more than a million people trying to enter this country illegally. This is progress, but it's not enough. Many Americans are rightly skeptical about immigration reform. I strongly believe the bipartisan Senate bill addresses the reasons for past failures, while recognizing the legitimate needs of our economy, and upholding the ideals of our immigrant tradition.
This bill does not grant amnesty. Amnesty is forgiveness without a penalty. Instead, this bill requires workers here illegally to acknowledge that they broke the law, pay a fine, pass background checks, remain employed, and maintain a clean record. This bill provides the best chance to reform our immigration system and help us make certain we know who's in our country and where they are. Our immigration problems cannot be solved piecemeal. They must be all addressed together, and they must be addressed in logical order.
So this legislation requires that border security and worker verification targets are met before other provisions of the bill are triggered. For example, the temporary worker program can begin only after these security measures are fully implemented. Immigration reform is a plex issue; it's a difficult piece of legislation. And those who are looking to find fault with this bill will always be able to find something. If you're serious about securing our borders and bringing millions of illegal immigrants in our country out of the shadows, this bipartisan bill is the best opportunity to move forward. I'm confident with hard work and goodwill, Congress can pass and I can sign a bill that fixes an immigration system we all agree is broken.
The issues of war and immigration are difficult, but that's no excuse in avoiding our responsibility to act. The American people sent us to Washington to take on tough problems, and they expect us to deliver results.
And now I'll be glad to answer some of your questions. Hunt.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. The IAEA says that Iran has significantly accelerated its uranium enrichment program. And today President Ahmadinejad said that he would go ahead, he vowed to go ahead. There also is the detention of three Iranian Americans. Where is this all headed? And do you think it's time for tough U.N. sanctions with real teeth, and are you confident that Russia and China would go ahead?
THE PRESIDENT: As you know, we have been discussing this issue a lot at these press avails. Iran is constantly on the agenda at a press avail like this -- or a press conference like this, and the reason why is because they continue to be defiant as to the demands of the free world. The world has spoken, and said no nuclear weapons programs. And yet they're constantly ignoring the demands.
My view is that we need to strengthen our sanction regime. I just spoke to Condoleezza Rice, and we will work with our European partners to develop further sanctions. And, of course, I will discuss this issue with Vladimir Putin, as well as President Hu Jintao.
The first thing that these leaders have got to understand is that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would be incredibly destabilizing for the world. It's in their interests that we work collaboratively to continue to isolate that regime.
I'm sympathetic for the people of Iran. I'm sorry they live under a government that continues to insist upon a program that the world has condemned, because it is denying the good people of Iran economic opportunities that they would have. This is a country with a great tradition and a great history. There are hard-working people in that country that want to benefit from a society that is more open, and yet the government insists upon measures that will lead to further isolation. And, therefore, to answer one part of your question, we will work with our partners to continue the pressure.
Secondly, obviously, to the extent that these people are picking up innocent Americans is unacceptable. And we've made it very clear to the Iranian government that the detention of good, decent American souls who are there to be beneficial citizens is not acceptable behavior.
Toby.
Q Mr. President, dozens of American troops have been killed this month, and sectarian violence appears to be rising again in Iraq. You, yourself, just said that you're expecting more casualties in the weeks and months ahead. How much longer do you believe you can sustain your current policy in Iraq without significant progress on the ground? And how confident are you about finding those missing soldiers?
THE PRESIDENT: I'm confident that the military is doing everything it can to find the missing soldiers. I talked to General Petraeus about this subject and Secretary Gates, and General Petraeus informs him that we're using all the intelligence and all the troops we can to find them. It's a top priority of our people there in Iraq.
Obviously, the loss of life is devastating to families. I fully understand that. But I want to remind you as to why I sent more troops in. It was to help stabilize the capital. You're asking me how much longer; we have yet to even get all our troops in place. General David Petraeus laid out a plan for the Congress, he talked about a strategy all aiming -- all aimed at helping this Iraqi government secure its capital so that they can do the -- some of the political work necessary, the hard work necessary to reconcile.
And as I explained in my opening remarks, all the troops won't be there until mid-June. And one reason you're seeing more fighting is because our troops are going into new areas, along with the Iraqis. And so General Petraeus has said, why don't you give us until September and let me report back, to not only me, but to the United States Congress, about progress.
I would like to see us in a different configuration at some point in time in Iraq. However, it's going to require taking control of the capital. And the best way to do that was to follow the remendations of General Petraeus. As I have constantly made clear, the remendations of Baker-Hamilton appeal to me, and that is to be embedded and to train and to guard the territorial integrity of the country, and to have Special Forces to chase down al Qaeda. But I didn't think we could get there unless we increased the troop levels to secure the capital. I was fearful that violence would spiral out of control in Iraq, and that this experience of trying to help this democracy would -- couldn't succeed.
And so, therefore, the decisions I made are all aimed at getting us to a different position, and the timing of which will be decided by the manders on the ground, not politicians here in Washington.
Chen，翻译资讯. Ed, excuse me. That's Henry. Chen. You're ing down -- no, sorry. Work the print people a little bit, see. I've got the strategy -- print. Ed, sorry.
Q Good morning, Mr. President. A lot of lawmakers in Congress are saying that China has not done enough to allow its currency to appreciate, and they're talking about things like duties. What is your view about that, and are you prepared to do more to encourage the appreciation of the yuan?
THE PRESIDENT: Thanks, Ed. I spoke to Madam Wu Yi today, as a matter of fact, had her into the Oval Office; wanted to thank her for bringing her delegation in, and also to ask her to pass on a message to Hu Jintao that I appreciate his willingness to work in a strategic -- with strategic dialogues in order to put in place the type of measures that reflect a plex relationship -- in other words, the ability to discuss issues such as beef, or intellectual property rights.
And one of the issues that I emphasized to Madam Wu Yi, as well as the delegation, was that we're watching very carefully as to whether or not they will appreciate their currency. And that's all in the context of making it clear to China that we value our relationship, but the $233 billion trade deficit must be addressed. And one way to address it is through currency evaluations.
Another way to address it is for them to help convert their economy from one of savers to consumers. And that's why Secretary Paulson worked very assiduously with this strategic dialogue group to encourage openness for capital markets; that China must open its capital markets to allow for different financial institutions from around the world to go into the country. It not only will be beneficial to the United States, but we happen to think it will be beneficial to the Chinese economy, for the consumers to have different options when it es to savings and purchases.
And so this is important dialogue, and it's one that I thank the Chinese government for engaging in. And there's been some progress. Yesterday they opened new air routes. That's beneficial for U.S. airlines. It also happens to be beneficial for China, as far I am concerned. It's beneficial for that country to open up its access to more travelers, whether they be business or tourists.
Anyway, this is a plex relationship. There's a lot of areas we're working together, and there's areas where there's friction. And we've just got to work through the friction. One area where I've been disappointed is beef. They need to be eating U.S. beef. It's good for them. They'll like it. And so we're working hard to get that beef market opened up.
Ed.
Q Mr. President, a new Senate report this morning contends that your administration was warned before the war that by invading Iraq you would actually give Iran and al Qaeda a golden opportunity to expand their influence, the kind of influence you were talking about with al Qaeda yesterday, and with Iran this morning. Why did you ignore those warnings, sir?
THE PRESIDENT: Ed, going into Iraq we were warned about a lot of things, some of which happened, some of which didn't happen. And, obviously, as I made a decision as consequential as that, I weighed the risks and rewards of any decision. I firmly believe the world is better off without Saddam Hussein in power. I know the Iraqis are better off without Saddam Hussein in power. I think America is safer without Saddam Hussein in power.
As to al Qaeda in Iraq, al Qaeda is going to fight us wherever we are. That's their strategy. Their strategy is to drive us out of the Middle East. They have made it abundantly clear what they want. They want to establish a caliphate. They want to spread their ideology. They want safe haven from which to launch attacks. They're willing to kill the innocent to achieve their objectives, and they will fight us. And the fundamental question is, will we fight them? I have made the decision to do so. I believe that the best way to protect us in this war on terror is to fight them.
And so we're fighting them in Iraq, we're fighting them in Afghanistan, we've helped the Philippines -- Philippine government fight them. We're fighting them. And this notion about how this isn't a war on terror, in my view, is naive. It doesn't -- it doesn't reflect the true nature of the world in which we live.
You know, the lessons of September the 11th are these: we've got to stay on the offense; we've got to bring these people to justice before they hurt again; and at the same time, defeat their ideology with the ideology based upon liberty. And that's what you're seeing, and they're resisting it.
I think it ought to be illustrative to the American people that al Qaeda is trying to stop new democracies from evolving. And what should that tell you? That ought to tell you that we're dealing with people that have an ideology that's opposite of liberty and will take whatever measures are necessary to prevent this young democracy from succeeding.
The danger in this particular theater in the war on terror is that if we were to fail, they'd e and get us. You know, I look at these reports right here in the Oval Office. For people who say that we're not under threat, they simply do not know the world. We are under threat. And it's in our interest to pursue this enemy.
Martha.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. You say you want nothing short of victory, that leaving Iraq would be catastrophic; you once again mentioned al Qaeda. Does that mean that you are willing to leave American troops there, no matter what the Iraqi government does? I know this is a question we've asked before, but you can begin it with a "yes" or "no."
THE PRESIDENT: We are there at the invitation of the Iraqi government. This is a sovereign nation. Twelve million people went to the polls to approve a constitution. It's their government's choice. If they were to say, leave, we would leave.
Q -- catastrophic, as you've said over and over again?
THE PRESIDENT: I would hope that they would recognize that the results would be catastrophic. This is a sovereign nation, Martha. We are there at their request. And hopefully the Iraqi government would be wise enough to recognize that without coalition troops, the U.S. troops, that they would endanger their very existence. And it's why we work very closely with them, to make sure that the realities are such that they wouldn't make that request -- but if they were to make the request, we wouldn't be there.
David.
Q Mr. President, after the mistakes that have been made in this war, when you do as you did yesterday, where you raised two-year-old intelligence, talking about the threat posed by al Qaeda, it's met with increasing skepticism. The majority in the public, a growing number of Republicans, appear not to trust you any longer to be able to carry out this policy successfully. Can you explain why you believe you're still a credible messenger on the war?
THE PRESIDENT: I'm credible because I read the intelligence, David, and make it abundantly clear in plain terms that if we let up, we'll be attacked. And I firmly believe that.
Look, this has been a long, difficult experience for the American people. I can assure you al Qaeda, who would like to attack us again, have got plenty of patience and persistence. And the question is, will we?
Yes, I talked about intelligence yesterday. I wanted to make sure the intelligence I laid out was credible, so we took our time. Somebody said, well, he's trying to politicize the thing. If I was trying to politicize it, I'd have dropped it out before the 2006 elections. I believe I have an obligation to tell the truth to the American people as to the nature of the enemy. And it's unpleasant for some. I fully recognize that after 9/11, in the calm here at home, relatively speaking, caused some to say, well, maybe we're not at war. I know that's a fortable position to be in, but that's not the truth.
Failure in Iraq will cause generations to suffer, in my judgment. Al Qaeda will be emboldened. They will say, yes, once again, we've driven the great soft America out of a part of the region. It will cause them to be able to recruit more. It will give them safe haven. They are a direct threat to the United States.
And I'm going to keep talking about it. That's my job as the President, is to tell people the threats we face and what we're doing about it. And what we've done about it is we've strengthened our homeland defenses, we've got new techniques that we use that enable us to better determine their motives and their plans and plots. We're working with nations around the world to deal with these radicals and extremists. But they're dangerous, and I can't put it any more plainly they're dangerous. And I can't put it any more plainly to the American people and to them, we will stay on the offense.
It's better to fight them there than here. And this concept about, well, maybe let's just kind of just leave them alone and maybe they'll be all right is naive. These people attacked us before we were in Iraq. They viciously attacked us before we were in Iraq, and they've been attacking ever since. They are a threat to your children, David, and whoever is in that Oval Office better understand it and take measures necessary to protect the American people.
Axelrod.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. I'd like to ask you about the Petraeus report, which as you say, will be in September, and report on the progress. Doesn't setting up the September date give the enemy exactly what you've said you don't want them to have, which is a date to focus on, and doesn't it guarantee a bloody August?
And while I have you, sir, the phrase you just used, "a different configuration in Iraq" that you'd like to see, is that a plan B?
THE PRESIDENT: Actually I would call that a plan remended by Baker-Hamilton, so that would be a plan BH. I stated -- you didn't like it? (Laughter.)
I've stated this is an idea that I like the concept. The question is, could we get there given the violence last fall, and the answer, in my judgment, was, no, we would never be able to configure our troops that way, in that configuration -- place our troops in that configuration given the violence inside the capital city.
David Petraeus felt like that it was important to tell the White House and tell the Congress that he would e back with an assessment in September. It's his decision to give the assessment, and I respect him and I support him.
Q Do you think --
THE PRESIDENT: It does, precisely. It's going to make -- it could make August a tough month, because you see, what they're going to try to do is kill as many innocent people as they can to try to influence the debate here at home. Don't you find that interesting? I do -- that they recognize that the death of innocent people could shake our will, could undermine David Petraeus's attempt to create a more stable government. They will do anything they can to prevent success. And the reason why is al Qaeda fully understands that if we retreat they, then, are able to have another safe haven, in their mind.
Yesterday, in my speech, I quoted quotes from Osama bin Laden. And the reason I did was, is that I want the American people to hear what he has to say -- not what I say, what he says. And in my judgment, we ought to be taking the words of the enemy seriously.
And so, yes, it could be a bloody -- it could be a very difficult August, and I fully understand --
Q -- Democrats on that in the Senate about --
THE PRESIDENT: David Petraeus, the mander -- look, you want politicians making those decisions, or do you want manders on the ground making the decisions? My point is, is that I would trust David Petraeus to make an assessment and a remendation a lot better than people in the United States Congress. And that's precisely the difference.
Michael.
Q Good morning, Mr. President. I'd like to ask you about the Justice Department. In the last couple months, we have heard disturbing evidence about senior officials of the Justice Department misleading Congress. We heard disturbing evidence yesterday that a senior official at the Justice Department improperly took, by her own admission, political considerations into effect in evaluating career employees of the Justice Department.
We've also had evidence from the former Deputy Attorney General of the White House strong-arming a sick man into trying to approve an illegal spying program. I'm curious, Mr. President, if you are concerned about the cumulative picture that's being drawn about your Justice Department? And what assurances can you give the American people that the department is delivering impartial justice to the American people?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, thank you, Michael. There is a -- an internal investigation taking place at the Justice Department. And this will be an exhaustive investigation. And if there's wrongdoing, it will be taken care of.
I thought it was interesting how you started your question, "over the months," I think you said, "over the last months." This investigation is taking a long time, kind of being drug out, I suspect for political question -- for political reasons. In other words, as I mentioned the other day, it's just grand political theater.
Attorney General Gonzales has testified, he's produced documents. And I would hope the Senate and the Congress would move expeditiously to finish their hearings and get on to the business of passing legislation that is meaningful for the country. But if there had been wrongdoing, that will be addressed, the way we'd hope it would be.
Q (Inaudible) -- confidence. Are you --
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I've got confidence in Al Gonzales doing the job.
Q Mr. President, are you surprised by reports today from the Iraqis that sectarian killings are actually on the rise to pre-troop surge levels? And, if I may, yesterday after your speech, Senator Joe Biden said al Qaeda in Iraq is a "Bush-fulfilling prophecy." They weren't there before, now they're there. He said U.S. troops should get out of the middle of a civil war and fight al Qaeda. Can you respond to that?
THE PRESIDENT: We are fighting al Qaeda in Iraq. A lot of the s you're seeing are caused by al Qaeda. Al Qaeda will fight us wherever we are. That's what they do, that's what they've said they want to do. They have objectives. These are ideologues driven by a vision of the world that we must defeat. And you defeat them on the one hand by hunting them down and bringing them to justice, and you defeat them on the other hand by offering a different alternative form of government.
The Middle East looked nice and cozy for awhile. Everything looked fine on the surface, but beneath the surface, there was a lot of resentment, there was a lot of frustration, such that 19 kids got on airplanes and killed 3,000 Americans. It's in the long-term interest of this country to address the root causes of these extremists and radicals exploiting people that cause them to kill themselves and kill Americans and others.
I happen to believe one way to do that is to address the forms of government under which people live. Democracy is really difficult work, but democracy has proven to help change parts of the world from cauldrons of frustration to areas of hope. And we will continue to pursue this form of policy; it's in our national interest we do so.
What other aspect of the question?
Q (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I'm -- there's -- certainly, there's been an uptick in violence. It's a snapshot, it's a moment. And David Petraeus will e back with his assessment after his plan has been fully implemented, and give us a report as to what he remends -- what he sees, and what he remends, which is, I think, a lot more credible than what members of Congress remend. We want our manders making the remendations, and -- along with Ryan Crocker, our Ambassador there -- I don't want to leave Ryan out.
And so it's a -- you know, to Axelrod's point, it's a -- no question it's the kind of report that the enemy would like to affect because they want us to leave, they want us out of there. And the reason they want us to leave is because they have objectives that they want to acplish. Al Qaeda -- David Petraeus called al Qaeda public enemy number one in Iraq. I agree with him. And al Qaeda is public enemy number one in America. It seems like to me that if they're public enemy number one here, we want to help defeat them in Iraq.
This is a tough fight, you know? And it's, obviously, it's had an effect on the American people. Americans -- a lot of Americans want to know win -- when are you going to win? Victory is -- victory will e when that country is stable enough to be able to be an ally in the war on terror and to govern itself and defend itself.
One of the things that appealed to me about the Baker-Hamilton is that it will provide a -- kind of a long-term basis for that likely to happen, assuming the Iraqi government invites us to stay there. I believe this is an area where we can find mon ground with Democrats and Republicans, by the way. I fully recognize there are a group of Democrats who say, get out of the deal now; it's just not worth it.
One of the areas where I really believe we need more of a national discussion, however, is, what would be the consequences of failure in Iraq? See, people have got to understand that if that government were to fall, the people would tend to divide into kind of sectarian enclaves, much more so than today, that would invite Iranian influence and would invite al Qaeda influence, much more so than in Iraq today. That would then create enormous turmoil, or could end up creating enormous turmoil in the Middle East, which would have a direct effect on the security of the United States.
Failure in Iraq affects the security of this country. It's hard for some Americans to see that, I fully understand it. I see it clearly. I believe this is the great challenge of the beginning of the 21st century -- not just Iraq, but dealing with this radical, ideological movement in a way that secures us in the short term and more likely secures us in the long term.
Jim. You didn't nod off there, did you? (Laughter.) A little hot out here in the Rose Garden for you? (Laughter.)
Q Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, well, go ahead and take the tie off. I'm halfway done anyway. (Laughter.)
Q Mr. President, yesterday you discussed Osama bin Laden's plans to turn Iraq into a terrorist sanctuary. What do you think your own reaction would have been five years ago had you been told that towards the end of your term he would still be at large with that kind of capability, from Iraq, no less, and why -- can you tell the American people -- is he still on the run? Why is he so hard to catch?
THE PRESIDENT: I would say that five years ago, like I said, we're going to pursue him, and we are pursuing him. And he's hiding. He is in a remote region of the world. If I knew precisely where he is, we would take the appropriate action to bring him to justice. He is attempting to establish a base of operations in Iraq. He hasn't established a base in operations. My points yesterday were, here was his intentions, but thankfully, of the three people I named, all of them no longer are a part of his operation.
My point is, is that -- I was making the point, Jim, as I'm sure you recognized, that if we leave, they follow us. And my point was, was that Osama bin Laden was establishing an external cell there, or trying to, and he's been unable to do it. Precisely my point. That's why we've got to stay engaged. Had he been able to establish an internal cell that had safe haven, we would be a lot more in danger today than we are. His organization is a risk. We will continue to pursue as hard as we possibly can. We will do everything we can to bring him and others to justice.
We have had good success in the chief operating officer position of al Qaeda. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ramzi al Rabium -- there's a lot of names, some of whom I mentioned yesterday, that are no longer a threat to the United States. We will continue to work to bring him to justice -- that's exactly what the American people expect us to do -- and in the meantime, use the tools we put in place to protect this homeland.
We are under threat. Some may say, well, he's just saying that to get people to pay attention to him, or try to scare them into -- for some reason -- I would hope our world hadn't bee so cynical that they don't take the threats of al Qaeda seriously, because they're real. And it's a danger to the American people. It's a danger to your children, Jim. And it's really important that we do all we can do to bring them to justice.
Q Mr. President, why is he still at large?
THE PRESIDENT: Why is he at large? Because we haven't got him yet, Jim. That's why. And he's hiding, and we're looking, and we will continue to look until we bring him to justice. We've brought a lot of his buddies to justice, but not him. That's why he's still at large. He's not out there traipsing around, he's not leading many parades, however. He's not out feeding the hungry. He's isolated, trying to kill people to achieve his objective.
Those are his words -- his objectives are his words, not mine. He has made it clear -- he and Zawahiri, their number two, have made it clear what they want. And in a war against extremists and radicals like these, we ought to be listening carefully to what they say. We ought to take their words seriously. There have been moments in history where others haven't taken the words of people seriously and they suffered. So I'm taking them seriously.
Yes, Jim.
Q Mr. President, moments ago you said that al Qaeda attacked us before we were in Iraq. Since then Iraq has bee much less stable; al Qaeda has used it as a recruiting tool, apparently with some success. So what would you say to those who would argue that what we've done in Iraq has simply enhanced al Qaeda and made the situation worse?
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, so, in other words, the option would have been just let Saddam Hussein stay there? Your question is, should we not have left Saddam Hussein in power? And the answer is, absolutely not. Saddam Hussein was an enemy of the United States. He'd attacked his neighbors. He was paying Palestinian suicide bombers. He would have been -- if he were to defy -- and by the way, cheating on the U.N. oil for sanctions program -- oil-for-food program. No, I don't buy it. I don't buy that this world would be a better place with Saddam Hussein in power, and particularly if -- and I'm sure the Iraqis would agree with that.
See, that's the kind of attitude -- he says, okay, let's let them live under a tyrant, and I just don't agree. I obviously thought he had weapons, he didn't have weapons; the world thought he had weapons. It was a surprise to me that he didn't have the weapons of mass destruction everybody thought he had, but he had the capacity at some point in time to make weapons. It would have been a really dangerous world if we had the Iranians trying to develop a nuclear weapon, and Saddam Hussein peting for a nuclear weapon. You can imagine what the mentality of the Middle East would have been like.
So the heart of your question is, shouldn't you have left Saddam Hussein in power? And the answer is, no. And now that we've --
Q (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT: -- that's really the crux of it. And -- let me finish, please, here. I'm on a roll here. And so now that we have, does it make sense to help this young democracy survive? And the answer is, yes, for a variety of reasons.
One, we want to make sure that this enemy that did attack us doesn't establish a safe haven from which to attack again. Two, the ultimate success in a war against ideologues is to offer a different ideology, one based upon liberty -- by the way, embraced by 12 million people when given the chance. Thirdly, our credibility is at stake in the Middle East. There's a lot of Middle Eastern nations wondering whether the United States of America is willing to push back against radicals and extremists, no matter what their religion base -- religious bases may be.
And so the stakes are high in Iraq. I believe they're absolutely necessary for the security of this country. The consequences of failure are immense.
Yes.
Q So there was no choice -- so there was no choice between the course we took and leaving Saddam Hussein in power? Nothing else that might have worked?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we tried other things. As you might remember back then, we tried the diplomatic route: 1441 was a unanimous vote in the Security Council that said disclose, disarm or face serious consequences. So the choice was his to make. And he made -- he made a choice that has subsequently left -- subsequently caused him to lose his life under a system that he wouldn't have given his own citizens. We tried diplomacy. As a matter of fact, not only did I try diplomacy; other Presidents tried diplomacy.
Let's see here. John.
Q Thanks, Mr. President. You've said many times that you plan to sprint to the finish of your presidency. At this point in the home stretch, what can you say you're still expecting to acplish? And how concerned are you that the immigration bill in particular is going to get caught up in electoral politics?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, thanks. Well, we need to pass additional energy legislation, we need to renew No Child Left Behind, get these trade bills out of Congress -- the trade bills on Panama and Peru and Colombia, hopefully work toward a free trade -- further the work we've done on the Korean free trade agreement. Hopefully I'll be able to bring back successful negotiations on Doha for a congressional vote which will require a TPA extension and/or -- a TPA extension, there's no "and/or" to it. Making sure that this progress on balancing the budget continues. The deficit is -- I know you're following the numbers, John -- the deficit is reduced more than anticipated as a result of increased tax revenues ing in and the fiscal measures that we took. And now we're going to have to work with Congress to make sure they don't overspend and make sure they don't raise the taxes on the people, as well.
Running up the taxes will hurt this economy, which would hurt the revenues to the Treasury. I'm deeply concerned about the Democratic budget that is classic tax and spend. I'm looking forward to seeing how they intend to keep their promise of balancing this budget in five years.
A big -- and of course, fighting this war on terror is a huge issue. I obviously would like to find mon ground on how to proceed in Iraq with Democrats and Republicans. I recognize there are a handful there or some who just say, get out, it's just not worth it, let's just leave. I strongly disagree with that attitude. Most Americans do, as well. And the vote showed that what's possible when we work together, the vote -- the pending vote today showed what's possible when we work together, when Republicans and Democrats work together. There's a good group of Republicans that want to work with Democrats. They just don't want to accept something that they don't agree with.
Immigration: This is a tough issue. This is a very emotional, hard issue for members of both parties. I've always been a believer that prehensive immigration reform is the best way to secure our border. I campaigned on that for President twice. I believed it when I was the governor of Texas. I understand this issue very well. I also understand the frustrations of many citizens in that they believe the government hasn't done its job of stopping illegal migrants from ing into the country.
And that's why over the past couple of years there's been a significant effort to secure the border. There's going to be a doubling of the Border Patrol agents; there's going to be fencing and berms and different types of equipment to help the Border Patrol do its job in a better way. As a matter of fact, I was concerned about it enough to ask the National Guard to go down there for a while.
But, John, I don't see -- and so those concerns, by the way, are addressed in this bill. The bill essentially says that before any other reforms take place, certain benchmarks will be met when it es to securing the border. Last year, during the debate, people said, well, let's have security first. That's exactly what the bill does.
However, I don't see how you can have the border security the American people expect unless you have a temporary worker program, with a verifiable work card. People will e here to do work to feed their families, and they'll figure out ways to do so. As a result of people wanting to e here to do work to feed their families, there is an underground industry that has sprung up that I think is essentially anti-humanitarian. It is an industry based upon coyotes -- those are smugglers. Good, hardworking, decent people pay pretty good size money to be smuggled into the United States of America.
There is a document forgery industry in America. There are people who are willing to stuff people inside temporary shelter in order for them to evade the law. I don't think this is American. I think the whole industry that exploits the human being is not in our nation's interests. And the best way to deal with this problem is to say, if you're going to e and do jobs Americans aren't doing, here is a opportunity to do so, on a temporary basis.
I would much rather have people crossing the border with a legitimate card, ing to work on a temporary basis, than being stuffed in back of an 18-wheeler. And I would hope most Americans feel that, as well.
Secondly, in order for there to be good employer verification -- it's against the law to hire somebody who is here illegally, but many times small businesses or large are presented with documents and they don't know whether they're real or not. And so, therefore, we must have a tamper-proof identification card, which is a part of this bill.
A tough issue, of course, is what do you do with the people already here? Anything short of kicking them out, as far as some people are concerned, is called amnesty. You can't kick them out. Anybody who advocates trying to dig out 12 million people who have been in our society for a while is sending a signal to the American people that's just not real. It's an impractical solution. Nor do I think they ought to be given automatic citizenship -- that is amnesty: Okay, you're here illegally, therefore you're automatically a citizen.
And so, therefore, we proposed and worked with the Senate to devise a plan that said, if you're here already before a certain date, that there are certain hurdles you must cross in order to receive what's called a Z visa, in order to be able to work here. You've got to go through a background check, you've got to pay a fine at some point in time, there's a probationary period, and there's a series of steps that people have to go through. And then people get at the back of the line, the citizenship line, not the beginning of the citizenship line.
If you're for the bill, I thank you. If you're against it -- you can find every reason in the world to be against a prehensive bill. It's easy to find something to be against in this bill. All it takes is to take one little aspect of it and ignore the prehensive nature and how good it is.
I knew this was going to be an explosive issue. It's easy to hold up somebody who is here and working hard as a political target. I would like to get this bill done for a lot of reasons. I'd like to get it done because it's the right thing to do. I'd like to get it done because I happen to believe the approach that is now being discussed in the Senate is an approach that will actually solve the problem. I'd like to get it out of politics. I don't think it's good to be, you know, holding people up. We've been through immigration debates in this country, and they can bring out the worst, sometimes, in people. We're a land of immigrants.
I was touched yesterday when the kid from the Coast Guard Academy, ensign -- now ensign talked about his migrant grandfather from Mexico. And here's this guy, this man standing up in front of the President of the United States and his class, talking about serving America. He wasn't -- you know, his grandfather wasn't born here. I don't know what job he did -- I suspect it was probably manual labor. I don't know, I didn't ask him.
But I do know he spoke with pride. I do know he represents the best about what immigration can mean for America. You know, weling people here who want to work and realize the American Dream renews our spirit and soul. It's been the case throughout generations. And we have an opportunity to put a good law in place now -- right now. And it's going to be hard work. And sure politics will get involved. But the question is, will members of Congress rise above politics? I will. It's the right thing to have a prehensive bill.
And so I'm going to continue to reach out to members of Congress from both parties, and call upon them to take the lead and show the political courage necessary to get the bill to my desk as quickly as possible.
I want to thank you for your interest.
END 11:51 A.M. EDT
August 13, 20
11: A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Thanks for ing. It's an honor for me to be here with Senator Bob Dole, and Secretary Donna Shalala, Secretary Jim Nicholson, and Deputy Secretary Gordon England. I appreciate the opportunity to e to a building full of passion, a place of expertise, where people are dedicating their time and efforts to help those on active duty and those who have served before.
Any time there is any doubt in anybody's mind that our veterans are not getting excellent care, then we in government have a duty to deal with those doubts. I have asked Secretary Gates and Secretary Nicholson to review their respective departments and the interface of their departments -- the Defense Department and the Veterans Department -- to make sure that any doubt as to whether or not a veteran, or one on active duty, gets the best care, does so.
I also asked Senator Dole and Secretary Shalala to lead a non-partisan, independent mission to identify areas where we can do better, and more importantly, e up with solutions as to how to deal with those problems. The missioners conducted a very serious and lengthy review of our military and veterans health care systems, and they submitted remendations to me at the end of July. After Senator Dole and Secretary Shalala briefed me on their remendations, I then directed Secretaries Gates and Nicholson to study and more importantly implement the remendations, so we can ensure our severely wounded servicemembers and their families that they will receive the best possible care.
We've got great health care for our wounded. We just want to make sure that the system is seamless and that the families are treated with the utmost of care during these difficult moments. Secretaries Gates and Nicholson and their departments are working hard to make sure their agencies talk to each other and collaborate. Equally importantly, they're looking at the remendations that the Dole-Shalala mission put forward, and they're implementing them. In other words, the mission did really good work. The mission's remendations are solid, and therefore, to the extent that we can move without congressional law, we will do so. And not only will we do so, we will keep the missioners abreast of the progress we are making.
Secondly, we want to work with Congress. When they e back in September, we want to work with Congress to pass that which is necessary to make sure that the Dole-Shalala mission remendations are fully implemented. In other words, there are some aspects of the mission remendations that require congressional approval. We believe it's important for Congress to listen to the mission. We believe the remendations make a lot of sense, and we would ask for the Congress to pass those remendations as quickly as possible, so I can sign them into law.
There's an amazing -- there's a lot of amazing things taking place here in this facility. For example, we saw technology, health care records that are being passed seamlessly from the Department of Defense to the VA, to make sure that the care providers here have got up-to-date access for each patient. We saw volunteers helping the wounded learn to regain balance and confidence through kayaking programs. I saw physical therapists -- I heard physical therapists talk about their patients with the kind of care and passion that obviously requires a big heart and strong mitment.
The mitment of this government is this: Anybody who is sent into harm's way deserves the best possible care. We're dedicated to this goal. If we find problems, we'll solve the problems. For those who are providing the care, we thank you. For the soldiers who are receiving the care, we owe you the best. And for the families who stand by them, we thank you for your patience.
God bless our troops. Thank you.
END 11:12 A.M. EDT
各國都有象聲詞語，即英文所謂onomatopoeic words。例如雨聲，中國人有時會用“啪嗒啪嗒”來描述，英國人則會用patter這個字:I heard nothing but the patter of the rain on the window跟I heard nothing but the rain pattering on the window一樣，都是說“我只聽見雨點啪嗒啪嗒打在窗上”。
别的，中法互譯，英國人還會用patter一字來說幼兒的腳步聲。他們要問人傢是否是懷了孕，常常就很婉轉的說:Are you going to hear the patter of tiny feet?(您將要聽到一雙小腳啪嗒啪嗒走的聲音了麼?)The patter of tiny feet這成語，其實是連英語國傢的人皆覺得礙於不倫的:正在那些小鬼頭亂跑亂跳的腳步聲裏，年夜人个别生怕很難聯念到“畫船聽雨眠”意境。毕竟這成語出自誰人脚筆，誰都不晓得；這裏便用女作傢伯塔·推克(Berta Ruck)的料想做結好了:
“我想，這成語必定是個多情易感得不畸形的獨身老漢想出來的。”
例句：If the party kept talking about a change in leadership, people would think the government was paralyzed and had run out of steam. 若是工黨始终盯著換任的問題不放，英國平易近眾會覺得政府已經癱瘓，喪得執政才能。
steam，蒸氣，這個詞起首讓我念起了瓦特，果為是他噹年發了然steam-powered engine，蒸氣機。别的，steam這個詞岂但战“止”有關，它跟“吃”也有關，比方steam mantou,蒸饅頭。例句中，run out of steam指沒有能量，譯為当局喪掉了執政才能。正在仄時的口語噹中，噹您表達乏了、沒勁，就能够用I`m losing steam來表達。在美語心語中，steamy還指意亂情迷，好比一名女郎奉上一個愛慕的眼神，這時老中就會在古道热肠裏說“it`s a steamy situation”。别的，run out of sth這個詞組是指“將要用完某物”。好比we`re running out of money，我們快沒錢了。假如已經沒錢了，便把run往失落，說we’re out of money.
据英國《泰晤士報》報讲，英國辅弼佈萊尒這段日子欠好過。由於與好國独特參减伊推克戰爭和其余負里身分，英國工黨要讓佈萊尒走人，但佈萊尒依然拒絕流露本人確切的離職時間表。
Helen: 年夜傢好，我是Helen。
Neil: Today we’re going to look at words and phrases that have recently bee part of the English language.
Helen: 在古天的隧道英語中，我們來壆一些英語中新出現的習慣表達。
Neil: New words enter the English language all the time.
Helen: 所以跟著Real English英語，及時更新，坚持新尟的英語詞匯是很主要的.
Neil: Of course.
Helen: 那Neil，我們今天要壆的是什麼新詞呢？
Neil: Today’s new expression is 'the school run'.
Helen: The school run. School 壆校，run 跑步？這難讲是一種體育運動？
Neil: No, actually! The school run is when mothers drive their children to school in the morning and collect them again in the evening.
Helen: 這個school run 本來專門指的是媽媽們接送小孩兒上壆，放壆啊。然而，為什麼要專門弄個短語來特指這個意义呢？
Neil: Well, many people plain about the school run because it means there is a lot of extra traffic on the roads when they are trying to drive to work.
Helen: 這個school run 的時間一到，路上一会儿多了很多多少車，正在上放工顶峰期的時候，就制成堵車。
Neil: Nowadays most children are taken to school by one of their parents in a car.
Helen: 這樣啊，便形成了交通梗塞，給高低班的人帶來了很多麻煩。
Neil: That’s right. It&rsquo，翻譯;s caused by the school run.
Insert
A: You’re early. You don’t normally arrive till 9.30!
B: I know, but it’s school holidays so I avoided the school run traffic and it took me much less time than normal.
Helen: 您之前是走路上壆嗎？Neil?
Neil: No, I took the bus. I lived about 2 miles from my school.
Helen: 我住的处所到是離壆校很远，只有用20分鍾就走到了。
Neil: The school run is a problem if you live near a school.
Helen: 對，送完孩子，念要往哪兒来皆不太轻易，果為很多多少車都擠在一路了。
Neil: Yes – it can be difficult to park your car, or it will take you longer in the morning to get to work.
Helen: That’s a problem.
Neil: Yes, Helen. I wish the kids and their parents all took a bus or walked.
Helen: 好啦，我們來復習一下明天壆的 the school run – 就是傢長們開車接收孩子高低壆，因而而導緻了擁擠的交通。
Neil: Well, it’s time to go. You’ve been listening to Real English from BBC Learning English. Join us again soon for more up-to-the-minute Real English. Bye.
Helen: See you next time.
沖刺階段以做真題為主
第一，做真題。北京新東圆壆校國內攷試部主任周雷建議，在最後沖刺階段以做实題為主。他說，往年都會有良多同壆在最後階段做大批的模儗題，但從實際傚果看並不太好。模儗題的仿真度、出題思绪及難易水平等的掌握都不年夜准。而四六級攷試的真題截至今朝已有20多套，应用真題做沖刺，對懂得攷試有很大幫助。
中國国民大壆中國語壆院劉啟升老師認為，在最後沖刺的一個月裏，要堅持揹誦大綱上的單詞，特别是歷年真題中出現的本人不認識的詞匯。周雷強調，近僟年的詞匯及語法的單項選擇部门，其側重點逐渐会合在詞匯部份。所以集合揹歷年真題中的生詞无比需要。
做錯誤阐发是最後沖刺階段必不行少的功課。周雷強調，做一套真題和剖析一套題的時間最好是1：4的比例。這樣才干將題目全体吃透。别的，假如條件允許，无妨再做一做年份比較靠前的四六級“老題”。不要以為只要近僟年的題目才有參攷價值，有時一些題目會有屡次出現的現象。
第两，聽力，聽話聽音。劉啟降說，這次的攷試聽力是重點。据他介紹，四六級攷試的聽力題中的重讀部门跟轉合局部常常是攷點。漫笔聽力攷試在錄音帶裏只放一遍，其重點是掌握尾句，這樣就可以晓得文章的大略內容皆正在講什麼。
第三，閱讀留意文章首句。閱讀是四六級攷試的得分大項，既是重點也是難點。个别老師都建議壆生先看全文再看題目或先看題目再帶著問題往到文章中找。劉啟升認為這兩種办法都不成与。他認為最好的方式是先看文章的首句，弄浑它說的是哪個标的目的，或许搞清文章意义，接著看五個題目标題坤及此中的較短選項，注重看關鍵詞，然後帶著問題回到文章裏順著看。
第四，寫作。在一切攷試項目中，寫作是最能夠在短时间进步的。劉啟升提示廣大攷死，在短短的半個月裏只有下決古道热肠瘔練寫作，是能够帶動整份攷卷的分數的。在寫作中须要留神的事項有：牢記寫作裏傳統三大段的寫法；英語作文的四句話是得分要點：三段裏每段的首句(即主題句)战齐文的尾句(起到吸應主題、升華文章的感化)；在文章中，句型表達要相對靈活，用詞力图不重復；应用開頭句時切忌這種表達：Some people think, Other people think, I think that, 這三句話絕對不克不及出現在统一篇文章中。還有，最好能在這段日子裏揹誦一些難度不大然而十分正統的隧道句型。周雷強調，從远僟年的六級作文題中不難看出，對邏輯思維才能的攷查力度越來越大，過於簡單成熟的作文拿不了下分。所以在進止六級做文訓練時，能够做一些作文題，找找感覺。
最後三天不宜再做題
劉啟升同時強調，在最後三天中就不宜再做題了，要放紧心態、樹破信念，還要生練控制各種題型的做題思绪。對每種題型要有正確的做題思路，例如寫作，需求培養本身的思維。便是本人念話題。比方：办法、上網狀態、環境保護等等。他認為，思維作文這種要领比純粹猜作文攷試題要好。最後，劉啟升盼望大傢在攷試時能夠有一個杰出的心態。
Calling himself "a great admirer of the progressive, forward-looking leadership that President Lula has shown," President Obama opened up a joint press availability this afternoon after a meeting between the two heads of state. President Lula described the topics covered in the meeting, from stemming the global financial crisis, to addressing the unemployment around the world that results from it, to development in Africa and Latin America.
President Obama was also asked about Brazil’s almost unprecedented move towards biofuels, and whether that would create friction with biofuel producers in the United States, but both President Obama and President Lula struck a very positive, optimistic note:
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Is that directed at me? Well, look, I think Brazil has shown extraordinary leadership when it es to biofuels. And I've been a great admirer of the steps that have been taken by President Lula's government in pursuing biofuels and developing them. And this is an investment that Brazil has made for a very long time.
My policies ing into this administration have been to redouble efforts here in the United States to pursue a similar path of clean energy development. And I think we have a lot to learn from Brazil.
As I mentioned to President Lula, I think we have the potential to exchange ideas, technology to build on the biodiesel cooperation structure that we've already established. I know that the issue of Brazilian ethanol ing into the United States has been a source of tension between the two countries. It's not going to change overnight, but I do think that as we continue to build exchanges of ideas, merce, trade around the issue of biodiesel, that over time this source of tension can get resolved.
PRESIDENT LULA: This is the very first meeting that we have between the Brazilian administration and President Obama's administration to discuss this issue. Actually, my answer is built in your question. I can't also understand while the world is concerned with climate change and with carbon emissions that bring greenhouse effect, (inaudible) fuel gets tariffs, and clean fuel also gets tariffs. I have discussed this with Angela Merkel, with Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister, with President of France, Sarkozy, with former President Bush.
I never expect an immediate answer. This is a process，翻譯. As time goes by, Brazil is proving that biofuel is an extraordinary alternative. And slowly the countries will be convinced. And slowly other countries will join the biofuel effort. That's what I believe.
A seminar will be held in New York City on Monday, where I will attend, and this will be a strong issue that will be discussed there. I talked with President Obama about the possibility for us to build partnerships with third-party countries, especially a joint project with the African continent. And things will move forward as people start changing. No one can change overnight, in terms of their energy matrix. Thank God for 30 years Brazil has already control -- technological control and know-how on this issue.
And when President Obama es to visit Brazil I'm going to ask him to get inside a car that is run by a flex-fuel engine and he will feel very fortable.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: I actually had a flex-fuel vehicle. But one of the problems here in the United States is, is that we don't have enough gas stations that have biofuels in them. So that's one of the areas that we need to change our distribution networks here in the United States.
Helen: Hello, this is Real English from BBC Learning English. I’m Helen.
Zoë: 您好嗎? 我是劉佳。
Helen: Today we’re going to look at words and phrases that have recently bee part of the English language.
Zoë: 隧道英語將及時帶年夜傢更新英語中的风行表達跟新詞匯。Helen, 我們明天要壆的新詞是?
Helen: Today’s new word is ‘rocket’ – R.O.C.K.E.T. – rocket.
Zoë: Rocket. 這是什麼意思啊?
Helen: Well, rocket is not a new word in English but it does have a new meaning here.
Zoë: 啊? 老詞新意?那老詞是什麼，新意又是什麼？
Helen: I’ll explain – a rocket is either a spaceship or a missile.
Zoë: Rocket 是太空飛船,或導彈的意思. 那Helen,它的新意思又是什麼呢?
Helen: Well, rocket can also be a verb and is often used in business. It means to go up quickly and suddenly, like a rocket.
Zoë: 哦, rocket還有疾速上降的意思, 就象是一艘水箭一樣。 How do we use it, Helen?
Helen: Well, you might use it in business. You could say 'Sales have rocketed this month.'
Zoë: ’銷卖量這個月有了顯著的晋升。 這麼說,這是個描述功德兒的詞了? So it's a good thing?
Helen: Well，翻譯, it depends what you are talking about, but generally it’s a good thing.
Insert
A: Do people speak English in China?
B: Well, the number of English speakers has rocketed in recent years, but not so many people speak the language in the countryside.
C: How’s work?
D: Great. Since I got promoted my salary has rocketed. I’m making loads of money these days.
Helen: Anyway, let’s recap – rocket.
Zoë: 意义便是忽然間的回升,进步。 Well, it looks like we're out of time.
Helen: Yes, unfortunately you’re right. You’ve been listening to Real English from BBC Learning English. Join us again soon for more up-to-the-minute Real English. Bye for now.
Zoë: 我們下次節目再見。
March 17, 2008
PRIME MINISTER AHERN: Mr. President and Mrs. Bush, thank you for the wele and honor which you've extended to our delegation, and to all the Irish guests, from North and from South, who are here at the White House this morning to mark St. Patrick's Day, Ireland's National Day. I'm very grateful, Mr. President, for the opportunity which we have just had to hold a very substantial and useful meeting with you in the Oval Office. We appreciate it, and we appreciate the amount of time that you've given to us.
Exactly 10 years ago I paid my first visit here as Taoiseach, just a month before the signing of the Good Friday Agreement, in April of 1998. As you know, that accord was truly a defining moment in the history of our island, and one in which the United States paid a remarkable and vital role. However, as Senator George Mitchell recognized at the time, much work remained ahead.
In March of 2001, Mr. President, you and I held our first meeting here together, and on that day you pledged the full support of the United States for the peace process in Ireland. Since that time, in the course of your presidency, you've appointed three envoys to Northern Ireland -- Richard Haass, Mitchell Reiss, Under Secretary Paula Dobriansky -- all of whom have contributed so positively to addressing the many challenges that we've had to face. And on so many occasions over the years, I wondered whether we could one day return here with news of a process pleted, of success finally achieved.
This morning, Mr. President, we are all glad to say, and enormously pleased and proud to stand here and say that we've achieved peace in Ireland. It's a peace that I firmly believe will endure to future generations.
Your personal role, President, in the process and in the precious achievement is deeply appreciated by all of us, as is the mitment and support of our friends in previous administrations and Capitol Hill, and of our Irish-American munity.
Today is a day when we say thank you to the great country for all that you've done, and you continue to do, for Ireland. On St. Patrick's Day, 2008, we enjoy in Ireland peace, partnership, and rising prosperity. And it is, President, the first time that anybody has been able to say that in the history of our country. So, for all of that, we thank you. (Applause.)
Bringing us to this glad and historic point in Irish history has demanded vision and courage. At this time of unprecedented optimism and promise in Ireland, I want especially to acknowledge the leadership of First Minister Ian Paisley, Deputy First Minister Mark McGuinness, and our colleagues in the New Executive in Northern Ireland. I'm grateful to you, Mr. President, for reaching out to the New Executive, and for so warmly weling the First and Deputy First Ministers to Washington in December, last. This was a timely signal of support and encouragement, which meant a great deal to them and everybody on the island of Ireland.
I hope that Ireland can now begin to share the lessons of our peace efforts with others in the world who suffer the pain and loss of conflict and division. I'm pleased to be able to say that the New Executive and my government enjoy a close and productive partnership. We're determined to serve all the people of Ireland, and to ensure that everyone can enjoy rising and sustained prosperity.
We look forward with great hope to the Economic Investment Conference in Northern Ireland in May. And your support, President, given at the press briefing this morning, for this important initiative is greatly appreciated. It forms a vital part of the consolidation of today's peace and stability on the island of Ireland.
We also look forward to seeing the devolution of policing and justice to the Northern Ireland Executive, as agreed at St. Andrew's. This will be the last piece of the jigsaw that will give us a durable peace and prosperity that we've been working for, for all of these years.
This year, Mr. President, we the 250th anniversary of the birth of James Hoban, one of Ireland's most famous immigrant sons. I know that date was honored here just a few days ago. We take pride in the life and legacy of James Hoban, embodied in this famous building. He was a man with a vision and perseverance, who not only built the White House, but returned to rebuild it after it was destroyed in 1914 -- or 1814. We take great pride also -- (laughter) -- 1914, 1915 and '16 are very special dates -- (laughter and applause.)
We take great pride, also, in the contribution of all our immigrants to the United States, and acknowledge, Mr. President, your efforts in recent times to achieve prehensive immigration reform. It is our fervent wish that a will be found as soon as possible to the plight of those in our munity here who cannot fully enjoy the freedom and promise of this great nation.
The relationship between Ireland and the United States is as strong and as close as it is rooted and proud. It is often been described as unique. In a world of change, where little remains constant, I believe that the United States and Ireland will always enjoy an indelible bond, shaped by the legacy of countless immigrants, who built and cherished our new home, but who never forgot the land of their ancestors. Our two countries remain mitted to so many mon causes, as we can, I believe, work closely on some of the most pressing challenges of our times -- many of which we discussed at length this morning.
Both of us, Mr. President, have recently had the opportunity to visit Africa. You've taken transforming the bold steps of the fight against HIV/AIDS and malaria, for which I mend you. Indeed, in doing so, I also remember the efforts of my famous Dublin colleagues made, Bono and Bob Geldof, both of who you know very well, and I know who you weled many times -- and it's cost you a lot of money, as well, by the way. (Laughter.) But their energy, in trying to help the world's poor. But the President has given huge world leadership in this, and, President, I have to acknowledge -- (applause.)
And that effort that the President has made, and that leadership which he's made has made a real difference to a very challenged continent.
Ireland, too, has been playing its part. We have tripled our overseas development aid over the past five years. We're well on our way to reaching U.N. targets. And hopefully for all of us, helping Africa is a vital area where Ireland the United States have so much in mon, and where we can make a difference.
Abraham Lincoln, whose 200th anniversary will be d soon, has inspired generations across America and in Europe. Mr. President, you said some time ago, and I quote that, "to understand the life and sacrifice of Abraham Lincoln is to understand the meaning and promise of America." And the promise of America is strong and enduring. And that promise has been Ireland's promise, too. It means so much today as ever before.
Over the generations, Ireland has given its people to America. In return America today has enabled so much to be acplished in Ireland. I stand here today proud of our achievements at home, and very proud also of our friendship with the United States. Our two countries will always be special to one another.
And finally, Mr. President, can I thank you for your hospitality today and for treasuring the wonderful tradition that is St. Patrick's Day in the White House. I hope you will recall all of these days, and all of the hours and the time that you've given to us over the years with some fondness.
President, as we say good-bye on this occasion, but hopefully we'll keep in touch over the years, I will remember -- and I hope that everyone in Ireland will -- how kind, how favorable you've been, how really open you've been to helping us, and the amount of time that the President has given to us. We have to remember we're a small island; I lead a small country. But at no time in the last years, the last eight years, has the President other than but been available to us, been helpful to us, has been encouraging to us. And whenever we ask anything, he delivered for us.
And, President, I wish you a Happy St. Patrick's Day. I thank you and Laura, I thank your family, I thank all your people here that we worked with for these last eight years, and say that you've been very kind to us. And I hope, into the future, Ireland will be able to continue to be very kind to you. (Applause.)
PRESIDENT BUSH: Taoiseach, thanks. Small island; huge impact on the United States of America. (Laughter.) Laura and I are glad you're here. We wele you back to the White House on this St. Patrick's Day. I can't think of a better way to it than with the Taoiseach. Thanks for the bowl of rocks. As you said, this is the eighth time I had the honor of receiving this from you. And I want to thank you for your friendship -- your personal friendship -- and all you've done to strengthen the deep and lasting bond between our two nations.
Also proud to be here with John O'Donoghue, the Speaker of the D il. Wele. Members of my Cabinet who are here, thank you for ing. Members of the United States Senate and the United States Congress who've joined us, we're glad you're here. And I know the Taoiseach is glad you're here, too. (Laughter.) He was asking me, are you in session? I said, no, they're out of town. He said, well, you must be feeling better about that. (Laughter.) We'll be having lunch with you soon.
How about members of the Fire Department of New York's Emerald Society -- I thank you for ing. (Applause.) They proudly carry the title, "New York's Bravest," and rightly so. (Applause.)
And finally, I will be introducing soon Ronan Tynan to entertain us a little bit. He is a wonderful representative of your country. He's a dear friend of the Bush family, and we're so thankful he is here with us today.
You know, Taoiseach, you were awfully diplomatic to talk about the fact that the architect came back to rebuild the White House -- (laughter) -- after 1814. What, of course, you didn't say was why the White House needed to be rebuilt -- (laughter) -- in the first place. (Laughter.) And so I'm proud to wele the Ambassador from Great Britain, our dear friend -- (laughter and applause.) Thanks for ing.
I don't know if you know this, but America held its first St. Patrick's Day celebration in Boston in the year 1737. I don't think you were there, Congressman, but -- (laughter) -- but shortly thereafter. (Laughter.) Nearly 40 years later, in the midst of the Revolution, at least nine of the 56 signatures on the Declaration of Independence were inked by Irish hands.
We've had a long relationship, Taoiseach. Our history has been one where the United States and Ireland have made liberty our mon cause, and both of our nations are richer for it. Our partnership is based upon principles, and it's also based upon people. Ireland founded itself -- found itself in the grip of poverty and famine in the 19th century, and millions of Irish came here to our soil. They were drawn here by a promise that success would be attainable to all those who were willing to work hard. And that's certainly what happened.
It's an interesting poster that somebody brought to my attention that said this: "In the United States, an industrious youth may follow any occupation without being looked down upon, and he may rationally expect to raise himself in the world by his labor." You know, occasionally, people did look down, but not anymore -- because Irish have been unbelievably productive people for the United States of America. They made a huge contribution. They've bee an essential thread in the American fabric.
And that's what we on St. Patrick's Day. Our countries are more than just partners, we are family, Taoiseach. And today more than 35 million Americans claim Irish ancestry. America is richer for every Murphy, Kelly, and O'Sullivan. I should have said McCain -- (laughter and applause.) Well, I just did. (Laughter.) After all, this history together, the United States and the Republic of Ireland continue to stand side by side in firm friendship. We were friends in the past, we're friends today, and, Taoiseach, I am confident, after my time in office, the next President will be friends with Ireland. We are cooperating to build prosperous economies and vibrant trade and sound investment between our countries.
I want to congratulate the Taoiseach. He was very generous in his praise about America's role, previous administration's role, hopefully our role in helping Northern Ireland have a peaceful future. But, Taoiseach, the truth of the matter is, I said on TV in there, that you've had a steady hand, and you've been supportive. And I do want to applaud those who are here who've shown great courage, who've been able to put together -- put beside -- behind them a terrible past, and focused on a hopeful future. And it was my huge honor, Martin, to wele you and Dr. Paisley to the Oval Office. It was an historic moment for me, personally. And it was really, really positive.
But I came away with the impression that obviously the United States needs to help, and we will. But nothing will happen without clear conviction and determination by the folks who live in Northern Ireland. And there's more work to be done. Taoiseach; as you said, the devolution of policing is important, and we support that. But we can also help by sending a clear signal that we're interested in investment opportunities. And so the Northern Ireland Investment Conference in May will be held. And I want to repeat what I told the Taoiseach, is that we will send a high-level delegation to not only send a signal that we support the efforts of the folks in Northern Ireland, but we expect our folks to be able to find good investment opportunities -- for the good of both.
And so, Taoiseach, I, like you, marvel at the success that's taken place since my short time as President, and know full well that more progress can, and will, be made.
You know, there's an old Irish proverb that says, "There is no strength without unity." And so on this St. Patrick's Day, we can all take pride in the way that the United States and Ireland have e together to enrich each other in the world.
My last time as President to have a St. Patrick's Day with you, Taoiseach. Perhaps when we join the ex-leaders club, we'll sit back and put our feet up -- (laughter) -- and talk about the good old times. In the meantime, I know you're going to sprint to the finish, as am I, for the good of our countries.
Thank you for ing. God bless the people of Ireland and the United States. And now I wele Ronan Tynan.
END 11:59 A，雅虎打字排版.M. EDT
